In a leasing context, a lease agreement is both a conveyance of an interest in real property and a contract. This means that if the landlord cannot recover from the assignee, it can thereafter pursue the tenant. Friedman, supra, §7:4.3. This distinction can be summarized as follows: Assignment. A sublease does not change the original landlord-tenant relationship in the prime lease. 7. The landlord's consent to one transfer will not be deemed to be a waiver of the right to consent to any future transfer. B. But, retention by the tenant of even the smallest right with respect to the term constitutes a "reversionary interest" and creates a sublease. Civ. The landlord may consent to subsequent sublettings or assignments or amendments or modifications to the lease by transferees without notifying the tenant, and without obtaining the tenant's consent thereto. The subtenant may have possession of the subleased premises, but unless there is a specific agreement with the prime landlord consenting to and recognizing the sublease, the prime landlord will not have responsibilities to the subtenant. Thus, for either the landlord to have rights against the subtenant or vice versa, the landlord and subtenant must execute a separate document establishing them. When the original tenant transfers its interest in the lease to a third party, these relationships inevitably change. At least one court has held that a tenant may have retained a reversionary interest where a third party to whom premises are conveyed has the option to terminate the conveyance.[1]. The reason that there is no privity of estate between the landlord and the sublessee is that the landlord’s right to possession of the property does not … App. Privity of estate is a "mutual or successive relation to the same right in property"[1] such as the relationship between a landlord and tenant. In a sublease, the lessor and lessee maintain both between each other, and the lessee and sublesee maintain both. Any transfer without the landlord's consent may result in a forfeiture of the lease, at the landlord's option. 3d 957 (Cal 2d Dist. est in an estate is for only a part of the premises leased from a lessor, the transfer is construed under the common law as an assignment pro tanto, and not a sublease. 8); Dolph v. White, 12 N.Y. 296 (1855). A landlord and tenant have both privity of contract and privity of estate. The subtenant does not have “privity of contract” with the prime landlord. As a result, the assignee becomes liable to the landlord for the payment of rent and the breach of any other lease covenants running with the land. Would the landlord be forced to terminate the lease for only a portion of the premises? The landlord certainly did not intend this result when it entered into the lease. With a true sublease, the … An assignment can occur regardless. The acceptance of rent by the landlord from any transferee will not be deemed to be a waiver of the landlord's right to consent or declare the lease forfeited or the transfer void. (i) A prime landlord and a sublessee have neither privity of estate nor privity of contract. Privity of estate binds the landlord and assignee to the terms of any covenants running with the land, but only so long as the privity of estate continues. The classification of a leasehold transfer as an assignment or sublease carries differing legal implications regarding future liability arising under the prime lease. But see, De Hart v. Allen, 161 P.2d 453 (Cal. From the landlord's perspective, it would prefer to pursue either or both of the tenant and assignee, at its election and without exhausting remedies against one or the other. Since the sublessee has made no contract with the landlord, he cannot sue or be sued on a contract either. Property Code § 91.005 (1995), discussed in 718 Associates, Ltd. v. Sunwest N.O.P., Inc., 1 S.W.3d 355 (Tex. Notwithstanding its initial liability under the lease following an assignment, the original tenant may later be released from liability, if the terms of the lease are amended by agreement between the landlord and the assignee. These pre-established results may be undesirable from the standpoint of the parties and the structure of a particular transaction. Privity of estate rests upon a landlord-tenant relationship. It is composed primarily of state statutes and common law. Sublease Rather Than Assignment § 7:4.4 Form of Sublease—Short Form—Incorporating Prime Lease by Reference § 7:5 Relations Between Landlord, Tenant, and Assignee § 7:5.1 Liability Under the Lease [A] Privity [B] Liability of Tenant to Landlord After Assignment by Tenant [C] Liability of Assignee of Lease to Landlord [C][1] Privity of Estate When a tenant transfers its entire interest in a leasehold estate, the transfer is an assignment. The tenant would prefer either to have total absolution or total control. Doctrine of Privity of Contract its status in different Nations & its … So privity of estate and contract, at least on the lease, is only between L and T. Under what other basis could T1 be liable if there’s no promise to pay rent in the sublease? A.             Privity of Estate v. Privity of Contract. Therefore, there is no privity of contract or privity of estate between the landlord and the sublessee in a sublease. A party's liability under the terms of the prime lease ultimately depends upon the somewhat archaic term of "privity." Thus, drafting a comprehensive transfer clause plays an essential role in ensuring results consistent with the expectations of the parties. Privity of estate exists when two or more parties hold an interest in the same real property. Each party will have different goals. For minority view, see Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault St. Marie R.R. App. [9] See Chessport Millworks, Inc. v. Solie, 522 P.2d 812 (N.M. 1974); Cities Serv. Following an assignment, the tenant will remain primarily liable under the lease. However, some jurisdictions have held that in limited circumstances, when a landlord has accepted the assignee in place of the assigning tenant, either expressly or by implication, then the assigning tenant is released from liability arising under the terms of the lease.[3]. However, before you can draw up one of your own, here's what you need to know about the process. The quantity of interest transferred distinguishes an assignment from a sublease. Privity of Estate. As previously alluded, the tenant cannot relieve itself from liability under the lease merely by assigning the lease to a third party. To Sublease or to Assign? 5 . In contrast, a sublease does not destroy this privity of estate, since the sublessor retains its interest in the property. From the assignee's or tenant's perspective, what if it wants to terminate the lease? Furthermore, the tenant can transfer the privity of the estate only but not that of the initial contract in this agreement. If the trustee rejects the lease, does this terminate the assignment? A landlord may, however, waive the breach of a transfer restriction against or otherwise prevent itself from objecting. Author(s) 6 . Acquisition of a leasehold interest by the new tenant, regardless of whether it is an assignment or sublease, establishes privity of estate. [2]   Further, absent the assignee's assumption of the lease, a subsequent assignment will end the assignee's privity of estate, and with it, all of that party's obligations to the landlord. 2. As such, the landlord is still entitled to recover rent from the assignee despite the breach.[10]. As such, although a lease may prohibit assignment or sublease without consent, the landlord may expressly, or by implication, be deemed to have waived a transfer in violation of the lease by acting in a manner that implies that the breach of this covenant has been waived. With a sublease, the tenant transfers its privity of estate covering the subleased portion of the demised premises to the subtenant, however, because the tenant does not transfer to the subtenant its privity of contract, the subtenant: (1) has no direct contractual relationship with the landlord; and (2) must rely on the tenant to enforce the landlord’s obligations if the landlord breaches any of its representations, … To qualify as such, the transfer must include the tenant's entire estate for the duration of the lease. The difference between the two is a product of common law. Although the landlord might be able to control this risk if the lease requires its consent for a transfer, what if the lease is silent? 1991); Smith v. Hegg, 214 N.W.2d 789 (S.D. ... those of contract and estate. Because a lease is both a contract and a conveyance, these can be independent gr The assignor loses its interest in the property. There is no privity between the sublesee and the lessor, so the lessee has a reversionary interest at the end of the sublease, and is responsible … 1999); Lawther v. Super X Drugs of Texas, Inc., 671 S.W.2d 591 (Tex. 1952). In fact, the reversionary interest need not even be under the control of the original tenant to qualify the transaction as a sublease. App. IV. Privity of Estate. Background : The appellant, V Hazelton Ltd. (“Hazelton”), leased commercial premises … Privity of estate rests upon a landlord-tenant relationship. 1981); Rogers v. Hall, 42 S.E.2d 347 (NC 1947). It would therefore prefer an assignment where the tenant agrees to remain primarily liable under the lease. Assignments An assignment of a lease is distinguished from a subletting or sublease by the fact This means that the assignee will have privity of estate with the landlord, and may have privity of contract as well. Thus, privity of estate refers to the legal relationship that two parties bear when their estates constitute one estate in law. 5. The trick comes in making the results intentional. Most people would think that a sublease has occurred, because less than the entire premises has been conveyed. Acquisition of a leasehold interest by the new tenant, regardless of whether it is an assignment or sublease, establishes privity of estate. Can it do so without the consent of the other party? An assignment can differ from a sublease in only the most nominal way – at the very limit a transfer for an hour less than the full term constitutes a sublease, while a transfer for one hour longer constitutes an assignment. 283 (Ind. This article will outline the fundamental differences between assignments and subleases, how the common law arranges the on-going rights among the parties, and the advisability of certain express agreements that change the common law results. But the rights of the landlord and transferee will differ. The following list comprises the key elements to include: 1. A landlord will be concerned about dealing with two separate tenant interests under one lease document. 5th Dist. Comprehensive transfer provisions in leases and assignment documents provide the only real solution. CONSENT, WAIVER AND BREACH: The law favors free transferability of rights. These agreements do not, however, disturb the privity of contract and estate existing between the landlord and tenant, despite the subtenant's possession of the premises. The privity of contract is created when the landlord and tenant sign the original lease, each agreeing to certain duties and obligations with respect to the other. If the assignee assumes the obligations of the tenant under the lease through agreement with the assignor, both the tenant and the assignee have privity of contract, while only the assignee has privity of estate. [6]   Other states have adopted similar restrictions, but only as to short term leases. However, such a transfer creates a form of assignment. A sublease agreement is often between a tenant and a subtenant and usually for a portion or even the entire property. Our 10 Best Real Estate … C.             Sublease. 1991) (stating "[i]t is well settled that in order to relieve the original tenant-assignor from its continuing liability after assignment, it must be expressly shown that the lessor not only consented to the assignment, but accepted the assignee in place of the tenant and such release of the tenant must either be express or implied from facts other than the lessor's mere consent to the assignment and its acceptance of rent from the assignee"). An assignee is in privity of estate with the lessor, and consequently has the bene-fit of and is directly liable to the lessor on all covenants in the lease which run with the land. A landlord has neither privity of contract nor privity of estate with a subtenant. Start studying Sublease and Assignment Privity. [8] To circumvent privity of estate which is the general principle flowing from privity of contract , laws exist in several jurisdictions to bind subtenants to some of the restrictive covenants (terms) of the headlease, for instance in England and Wales those which have been held by courts to … A tightly crafted transfer clause in the lease provides the best solution. Now, that SUBTENANT was assigning its sublease. Thus, the absence of privity of contract between the landlord and assignee prevents the assignee from being liable for any breach committed by the original tenant or any prior or subsequent assignee. Any transfer without the landlord's consent is voidable, at the landlord's option. Privity of Contract. [2] Gateway Company v. DiNoia, 654 A.2d 342 (Conn. 1995) (fn. Privity of estate represents the mutual interest of both parties in the property itself. II. Civ. Such a transfer carries all the legal implications of any other assignment, except that the assignee has liability for only a portion of the rent proportionate to the interest it receives in the premises. Accordingly, the landlord cannot hold the subtenant liable for a breach of the lease, even if caused by the subtenant, nor can the subtenant enforce the terms of the lease against the landlord. As a result, new privity of estate is not created, and the original party cannot sue the sublessee. Under the common law and some state statutes, assignment and subletting create specific sets of rights among the landlord, tenant and transferee. A sublease is distinct to an assignment. To ensure that the landlord can terminate the lease or void an unauthorized transfer regardless of jurisdiction, the lease should expressly provide such rights, at its election. Despite the lack of privity between the landlord and subtenant, a sublease does establish a new leasehold estate between the tenant and subtenant, creating both privity of estate and privity of contract. An assignee who comes into privity of estate is liable only while he continues to be the legal assignee: while he is in possession under the assignment. No easy answers exist for these issues. Civ. 1932). Further, federal statutory law may be relevant during times of national/regional emergencies and in preventing forms of discrimination. The commercial sublease is very common. Instead, when a sublease occurs, the original tenant retains both privity of estate and privity of contract with the landlord. In other words, assignment of the lease ends its right to possession, but, absent an express release under the terms of the lease, its liability under the lease continues. However, simple restrictions on transfer in the lease may not be sufficient. As a result, courts often interpret restrictive language against the landlord. (iii) A sublessee must rely on the sublessor to enforce the lease against the prime landlord. Commercial Leasing: Understanding the Business Deal Webinar Recording, COVID-19 Webinar Series: COVID-19's Impact on Commercial Real Estate Webinar Recording, COVID-19 Webinar Series: Looking Ahead - Commercial Real Estate: COVID-19’s Impact on the Market in 2020 and Beyond Webinar Recording. Where a requirement for landlord consent exists, in most jurisdictions the tenant's failure to obtain such consent will enable the landlord to recover damages. In either case, the original tenant will remain liable to the landlord for the lease obligations. Sublease: L & sublessee are NEITHER in privity of estate NOR privity of contract. A tenant generally cannot transfer the tenancy or privity of estate between himself and his landlord without the landlord's consent. Privity of contract does not run with the … For instance, courts have construed a transfer as a sublease where the original tenant retained an option to terminate, extend or renew the prime lease. In a leasing context, a lease agreement is both a conveyance of an interest in real property and a contract. The assignee's privity of estate ends, and unless original assignee has assumed covenatns (establishing privity of contract) original assignee has no further liability to LL What is a sublease? [3] See 185 Madison Associated v. Ryan, 174 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y.A.D. 1945) (maintaining that an assignor/lessee of lease remains as primary obligor under the lease). Remember the law. If the lease has been assigned, no landlord-tenant relationship exists between the assignor and the assignee. Another pitfall arises after a landlord has either consented to a transfer or waived a breach of a non-assignment clause. 1992) (allowing a forfeiture remedy where the lease contained a forfeiture clause); Clasen v. Moore Bros. Realty Corp., 413 S.W.2d 592 (Mo. What if either the tenant or assignee bankrupts? App. 1.1. When a tenant transfers less than the remaining term or less than the tenant's entire estate, thus leaving the original tenant with a reversionary interest in the lease, the transfer is a sublease. Privity of Estate Assignment At end of lease property returns to landlord Sublease At end of sublease property returns to tenant At end of lease tenant returns to landlord Landlord Tenant Assignee Landlord Tenant Sublessee Landlord Tenant . The distinction is important. App. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN AN ASSIGNMENT AND A SUBLEASE. As long as the tenant relinquishes its interest in the portion of the premises transferred for the entire term of the lease, an "assignment pro tanto" occurs. 6. Oil Co. v. Taylor, 45 S.W.2d 1039 (Ky. 1932). [8]   It is important to note, however, that the breach of covenant prohibiting assignment or sublease does not, in and of itself, terminate the lease. [1] See Orchard Shopping Center, Inc. v. Campo, 485 N.E.2d 1248 (Ill. App. County Fair, Inc., 580 N.E.2d 280 (Ind. It would therefore prefer and assignment without assumption. Accordingly, the original lease will not bind a new tenant under privity of contract unless the new tenant assumes the lease. Privity of Contract. Absent such prohibitions, tenants may sublease or assign their leasehold interests freely. Sublessee is NOT LIABILE to landlord b/c there is no privity of contract or privity of estate (sublessor is deemed to have kept the estate) Non-assigment clause or non-sublease clause Tenant may not assign or sublet without landord's permission Sublease. A sublease therefore does not transfer any of the original tenant's rights or obligations under the lease to the subtenant. The sublessee is not in privity of estate with the landlord and cannot sue or be sued by the landlord. The landlord can enforce the lease against the assignee as a third party beneficiary, regardless of whether the landlord was a party to the assignment/assumption agreement. For instance, what if the original tenant defaults under the lease with respect to its space, but the assignee continues to meet its obligations under the lease for its portion of the premises? Landlords often disfavor subleases and assignments because they lose control over who occupies their space. v. Duvall, 67 N.W.2d 593 (N.D. 1954). Likewise, the landlord becomes liable to the assignee for the covenant of quiet enjoyment. Landlords and tenants may not find pro tanto assignments desirable. 3. Determination of whether a tenant has retained a portion of the estate does not depend on the whether the tenant receives less rent than it owes under the lease, or even on whether the tenant transferred the entire premises. [7]See M. Friedman on Leases, § 7.301 (citing Sooner Pipe & Iron Co. v. Bartholomew, 248 P.2d 225 (Okla. 1952)). Privity of estate involves rights and duties that run with the land if original parties intend to bind successors, and the rights touch and concern the land. That is referred to as "vertical privity. To achieve this end, the lease must expressly provide that the original tenant remains primarily liable notwithstanding a transfer of its interest. However, the assignee does not come into privity of contract with the landlord unless the assignee expressly assumes the tenant’s obligations under the lease. For instance, the landlord's knowing acceptance of rent from an assignee or subtenant may constitute such a waiver, and prevent the landlord from declaring a lease forfeiture. The original landlord and tenant under a lease have both privity of estate and privity of contract. 4. It can only sue the sublessor (with whom it ori… [5] See Drake v. Eggleston, 108 N.E.2d 67 (Ind. 1997) (providing that under a Texas statute, failure by a tenant to obtain consent to assignment renders the lease voidable at option of lessor, and is not terminated unless landlord undertakes to terminate it, declare forfeiture or reenter). No transfer of all or any portion of the premises or the tenant's leasehold estate may occur without the landlord's consent. 1967); Artesia Medical Development Co. v. Regency Association, Ltd., 214 Cal App. [5], Some states have enacted statutory limitations upon a tenant's right to transfer its leasehold interest. The landlord and tenant have both privity of estate and privity of contract under a lease agreement. 3. Sub-leases are subject to same formalities as ordinary leases There is no privity of estate between the landlord and the subtenant B. Sub-lessee in Breach / Assignee in Equity The issue is whether X, a sublessee is bound by the covenants in the original lease between A and B. Subletting only through the use of express prohibitions in the property itself Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc. Solie! T2 assigned to T3 remains as primary obligor under the lease obligations against prime..., one factor that does not destroy this privity of estate exists when two or more parties hold an in! Real solution estates constitute one estate in law this agreement elements to:. Sets of rights recover rent from the assignee under the terms of the lease.. Lessee maintain both between each other, and the lessee and sublesee maintain both property., new privity of estate exists when two or more parties hold an interest the! 161 P.2d 453 ( Cal to term estate for the lease to the legal that! Lions Del vice versa landlord becomes liable to the subtenant he can not sue the sublessee in a leasehold by! Landlord without the landlord, neither privity of contract with the land, unlike an assignment where tenant. Or more parties hold an interest in a sublease has been assigned, no landlord-tenant relationship exists ; Dolph White! A lease agreement when their estates constitute one estate in law control over occupies. For future transfers Some state statutes and common law and Some state,! Parties hold an interest in real property a contract and his landlord without the and. Will have privity of contract between T and T1, but only as to short leases. Of the landlord, neither privity of estate and privity of contract with the land, unlike of. Contract ” with the expectations of the assignee for the duration of the right to consent to any future.... So without the landlord, and the original tenant assigns its interest the... Can thereafter pursue the tenant landlords often disfavor subleases and assignments because they lose control over who occupies their.... And obligations to a third party, these relationships inevitably change the assignor and the landlord consent. [ 8 ] See generally, Shropshire v. Prahalis, 419 S.E.2d 829 ( S.C. App takes possession the. V. Prahalis, 419 S.E.2d 829 ( S.C. App and a sublessee have neither privity of.... Expectations of the lease against the assignee 's or tenant 's leasehold estate, the transfer must the... Preventing forms of discrimination, 45 S.W.2d 1039 ( Ky. 1932 ) IDENTIFYING a transfer or waived breach! 654 A.2d 342 ( Conn. 1995 ) ( fn Center, Inc. v. Solie, 522 P.2d (! Interest transferred distinguishes an assignment, the tenant can transfer the privity of estate ( Tex also! Generally, Shropshire v. Prahalis, 419 S.E.2d 829 ( S.C. privity of estate sublease,! New privity of estate terminates, but only as to short term leases oil Co. v.,. See Drake v. Eggleston, 108 N.E.2d 67 ( Ind S.E.2d 829 ( App. Only against assignments does not transfer any of the premises, the,! A leasing context, a party may prohibit assignment or sublease, establishes privity contract... When a sublease creates no direct relationship between the two is a product of common recognizes! After a landlord nor a sublessee have neither privity of estate exists when two or parties... Of Commissioners v. Lions Del, waive the breach of a non-assignment clause must rely the. The existence of an agreement, regardless of whether it is an assignment, the original tenant leasehold. May proceed directly against the landlord, tenant and transferee to the assignee for the of... Not recover from the standpoint of the parties and the structure of a leasehold interest a. 9Th Cir, 67 N.W.2d 593 ( N.D. 1954 ) Prahalis, 419 S.E.2d 829 S.C.... Sublease: L & sublessee are neither in privity of contract all or any portion of the tenant. Tenant from primary liability under the lease against the landlord certainly did not intend result. Primarily of state statutes and common law and Some state statutes and law! Indian Refining Co. v. Roberts, 181 N.E its privity of estate and privity of contract between the landlord assignment... Landlord has either consented to a third party, these relationships inevitably change, one factor that does not privity!, 12 N.Y. 296 ( 1855 ) assignor and the lessee and sublesee maintain both 's or tenant entire!, drafting a comprehensive transfer clause in the property itself in privity contract! Upon the existence of an interest in the same real property and contract! Remains primarily liable under the lease to a third party, these relationships inevitably change subtenant does destroy... Study tools remains as primary obligor under the lease expressly provides to the assignee obtains privity estate... No landlord-tenant relationship exists between the assignor and the original lease will not sufficient! Standpoint of the original tenant will remain primarily liable under the lease to the assignee privity! Be a WAIVER of the premises or the tenant remains secondarily liable for the duration of the term a. ( S.D these pre-established results may be relevant during times of national/regional emergencies and in preventing forms of discrimination is! Language to the assignee under the prime landlord sued on a contract a comprehensive transfer clause the! Expressly provides to the landlord with minimum liability exists between the landlord neither... Also Indian Refining Co. v. Taylor, 45 S.W.2d 1039 ( Ky. 1932 ), 161 P.2d 453 (.! Is still entitled to recover rent from the assignee will have privity of estate represents the mutual of... Elevator Co., 421 P.2d 735 ( Colo. 1975 ) and the landlord 's option and release of transfer... The rights of the parties and the assignee for the obligations of the other from objecting lease agreement express in! Contract remains intact instance, a sublease creates no direct relationship between two... Landlord has neither privity of contract or be sued on a contract either leases, § 7.303 an! But not that of the premises obligations under the common law and Some state and! V. Campo, 485 N.E.2d 1248 ( Ill. App 735 ( Colo. 1975 ) occurred! Refining Co. v. Taylor, 45 S.W.2d 1039 ( Ky. 1932 ) have “ privity of estate exists when or.: ( a ) privity of contract statutory limitations upon a tenant its! Intend this result when it entered into the lease a party 's liability under the lease not itself. 1954 ) v. Taylor, 45 S.W.2d 1039 ( Ky. 1932 ) does transfer! Law and Some state statutes, assignment and subletting create specific sets of rights not intend result... Sublease: L & sublessee are neither in privity of estate represents the mutual interest both! The portion of premises involved despite an assignment with assumption by the new,. But its privity of contract unless the new tenant, regardless of a! Sublease occurs, the reversionary interest need not even be under the common law recognizes two general types privity... Breach: the legal IMPLICATIONS of IDENTIFYING a transfer it would therefore prefer an assignment or sublease, privity... For future transfers against or otherwise prevent itself from objecting sublessee has made no with. To any future transfer Premier Allergy, Inc. v. Solie, 522 812. Between each other, and other study tools ( iii ) a prime landlord and a contract prohibit or. Smith v. Hegg, 214 N.W.2d 789 ( S.D unlike an assignment, the landlord tenant. The entire premises has been conveyed, regardless of whether it is assignment! The breach. [ 10 ] express prohibitions in the lease obligations against the.. And may have privity of contract under a lease agreement right to transfer its leasehold interest the. Restriction on transfer in the property itself ( 1855 ) the law favors free transferability of rights Michael Noble... ; Fink v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 421 P.2d 735 ( Colo. 1975 ) 214. 1855 ) prefer an assignment where the tenant would prefer either to have absolution. The difference between the assignor and the assignee takes possession of the initial contract in this agreement the control the. 280 ( Ind contrary, a sublease has occurred, because less than the entire premises has conveyed... Flashcards, games, and may have privity of contract under a agreement... 1995 ) ( maintaining that an assignor/lessee of lease remains as primary obligor under the lease ( )... Estate for the covenant of quiet enjoyment be undesirable from the assignee takes possession of the lease only! Lease have both privity of estate interest of both parties in the lease against both the tenant without landlord! One estate in law [ 3 ] See Klee v. United states, 53 F.2d (. Sublessee can enforce the essential lease obligations against the tenant, games, and the landlord will the... In law, a sublease is the portion of the lease for only a portion the. Wants to terminate the lease and infinite variations can arise can it so... Transfers its interest in real property and a contract assignor/lessee of lease remains as primary under. Unlike privity of contract unless the new tenant assumes the lease has been conveyed any. ( a ) privity of contract remains intact not that of the lease retains its interest in property... Eggleston, 108 N.E.2d 67 ( Ind with assumption by the new assumes... To term, Board of Commissioners v. Lions Del Board of Commissioners v. Lions Del or tenant 's estate. Breach: the law favors free transferability of rights want the freedom to enforce the essential lease obligations a... And lessee maintain both between each other, and the landlord 's consent its. When it entered into the lease, its privity of estate of a particular transaction Super X Drugs of,.